home | about | magazines | articles | news | order form | links | site history

 

ARTICLES ON ATTACK ON ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE

by

 MARTIN WALKER

23/5/06

[The following is a response from eminent health journalist Martin J Walker to a recent call for the NHS to stop paying for complimentary and alternative therapies Full text of the letter to trust chief executives ]

Every time there is an attack on alternative medicine people write similar letters in response, defending these therapies but always, there is a lack of analysis, historical or otherwise. This means that although the number of replies and combative responses is growing and we are 'learning' in that sense, no one seems to be describing the supporters of orthodox medicine in their context and drawing attention to conflict of interest and vested interest. Consequently it always looks as if these critics are serious people with important things to say, rather than shallow half wits guided entirely by vested interest.

Dr Michael Baum was a founder member of the Campaign Against Health Fraud (now called HealthWatch http://www.healthwatch-uk.org/committee.html ). HealthWatch, which is linked to important US lobby groups CSICOP (Committee for the Scientific Investigation into Claims of the Paranormal) and ACSH (American Council on Science and Health) has been responsible for a whole serious of attacks on alternative health, CAM and especially homeopathy.

Other signatories to the Times letter also have links with HealthWatch, most particularly Ernst who over the last decade has campaigned consistently against alternative medicine (and can most accurately be described as the only Professor of alternative medicine in Britain who argues the case for pharmaceutical medicine). Ernst spoke at the 15th Annual meeting of CSICOP held in London where he delivered a quite childish but supposedly humorous deconstruction of alternative medicine to the assembled twenty odd anoraks in the audience. At that meeting amongst his own people, Ernst made no attempt to be even vaguely academic or supportive of alternatives.

Within the last two years, HealthWatch has been taken over - it has been floundering for years - by the new industry-backed lobby groups, The Science and Media Centre and Sense About Science (SAS), these groups are backed with bundles of money from the Association of British Pharmaceutical Industries (ABPI) as well as individual drug manufacturing companies. They are linked to some of the most avid de-regulating 'libertarian' US lobby groups.

The founder of the Campaign Against Health Fraud (HealthWatch) Caroline Richmond, has been writing for these lobby groups over the last couple of years and providing information for  Mike Fitzpatrick  who is both a member of SAS and makes journalistic contributions to Spiked, the online news vehicle of the ex-Revolutionary Communist Party members who are now deeply embedded in the pro-science Lobby Groups.

It was the above organisations working out of the Royal Society, which send a letter to the Times with a list of signatories protesting about critics of GM crops. In this case however, environmental organisations and journalists like George Monbiot (the Guardian newspaper) organised with considerable effect against them. Why, oh why, can't supporters of alternative medicine do the same! Apart from my two books, Dirty Medicine and Zero Risk, no one has come forward to organise web sites with an ongoing critique of these industry-backed lobbyists.

One last point, Prince Charles is to be congratulated for his continuing and committed support for alternative medicine but if I was him I would certainly get frustrated at the lack of serious support. In the early 1980s, it was Charles who opened and became a patron of  the Britsol Cancer Help Centre. In 1990, the Centre was wrecked by a bogus scientific paper published in the Lancet, which claimed that women with breast cancer who attended the Centre died more quickly and in greater number than those who had orthodox treatment. The unfortunate response to this attack, was again, constant picky academic arguments about whether or not the paper's writers had got their statistical analysis correct.

What there should have been was a full blooded political assault on HealthWatch and its associates, the writers of the paper and the connivance of the Lancet in its publication. Fifteen years later alternative medicine is coming under increasing attack from industrial vested interests but we are unfortunately responding in the same piecemeal manner. It's time that supporters of CAM and alternative medicine, really did get their political act together. While environmentalists, greens, anti-corporate critics and pharmaceutical company critics, have all formed political fact gathering organisations and write consistently about the corporate lobbies which are managing skewed news, the practitioners of homeopathy and other valuable therapies, appear utterly unable to organise against the threat they are facing.

Anyone who wants to read in greater depth about any of the above, should obtain copies of my books Dirty Medicine and Brave New World of Zero Risk and perhaps visit the websites:

www.zero-risk.org and www.slingshotpublications.com

If we don't make ourselves aware of the history of these attacks we will never be able to combat them and they will gradually incur increasing damage.

Regards, Martin Walker.

 

Further information, e-book download and purchase details for: Dirty Medicine and Skewed

 

More about Martin J Walker

 


 

The Brave New World of Zero Risk

by Martin J Walker

The Zero Risk? Group which includes lawyers and other professionals, has been set up specifically to distribute Martin Walker’s book
The Brave New World of Zero Risk:

 

New Labour has approached every aspect of its political agenda with spin. It is not a party of the people in any sense, but a party against the people in every sense.

In the realm of science and medicine, New Labour, its lobby groups and spin doctors have grown used to propagandising on important issues. Today, independent scientific enquiry is rare, there is only pharmascience, corporate science and the profitable science of new technologies.

The structure of corporate science, which researches the adverse effects not just of cigarettes and chemicals but of mobile phone masts and pharmaceuticals, is completely controlled by the companies who produce these products. Dirty tricks, spin and corporate censorship have become the predominant norm.

No quick fix is going to change this situation. To get politics out of science will entail weeding the corporations out of government and returning politics to the service of the public, while introducing a public debate within local and national democratic structures.

The politicisation of science is also in large part the responsibility of scientists themselves, many of whom have seen in industry and corporations the saviours of science. Scientists have to find a new and separate autonomy; they have to design anew their own institutions, which must not be funded and peopled by corporate interests or dominated by manipulative government apparatchiks.

Read The Brave New World of Zero Risk:

at www.zero-risk.org

 

Click for an Excellent range of Natural Health Products